Hello, alain.coch...@unistra.fr writes:
> Hello again. What I did not notice earlier is that, while performing > `C-c C-c' on the first instance of '[fn:1]' -- which results in the > point being put on the 1st letter of 'tnote' --, the minibuffer > displays the following message: > > Edit definition and go back with `C-c &' or, if unique, with `C-c > C-c'. > > So it seems to me that if the behavior is correct, then the message is > inconsistent (`C-c C-c' does not go/jump back). Fair enough. I reverted the 3 years old commit. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
