"Garreau, Alexandre" <galex-...@galex-713.eu> writes: > How’s that?
I think limiting the number of characters in the description is to be on the safe side. 30 characters are usually enough to understand what the mail is about. > it just feels wrong: if it’s to long, users can truncate themselves, > it’s straightforward, but finding again and adding the end, or finding > the appropriate customization, isn’t. > Also what’s the utility of it? See above. In any case, if other users feel strongly about changing the default value, I don't mind. I hope you understand that one data point is not enough, tho. Regards,
