Hello, Thierry Banel <tbanelweb...@free.fr> writes:
> Org defines C-c C-x i as org-insert-columns-dblock. Instead, it could call > the org-insert-dblock dispatcher shown here. The original > org-insert-columns-dblock would be one among > other dblock inserters. > > Possible dblocks: > org-insert-columns-dblock > org-clock-report > propview > invoice > org-insert-dblock:aggregate > org-insert-dblock:join > org-insert-dblock:transpose > > Any future dblock inserter would be taken into account by the > dispatcher just by providing an autoloadable > org-insert-dblock:something function. I think we could do something similar to links, i.e., populate a variable (for links, it is `org-link-parameters') with a command (`org-link-set-parameters'), so the dispatcher knows what dynamic blocks can be provided. Otherwise, it sounds like a good idea. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
