On 2019-02-08, at 06:51, Kaushal Modi wrote: > On Fri, Feb 8, 2019, 3:28 AM Jens Lechtenboerger <lech...@wi.uni-muenster.de > wrote: > >> - org-reveal [3]: R >> - org-re-reveal [4]: r (conflict with RSS) > > I see that org-re-reveal is based off org-reveal. So do you see a use case > where people would `require' both org-reveal and org-re-reveal? If not, > then using the same binding as that of org-reveal should be fine too.
I don’t recommend that but org-re-reveal should allow for a parallel installation. Therefore, I would like to bind a different key. > I'm pretty sure there are many more Org backends out there. For example, I > have a little ox-minutes backend that uses the M binding (and overrides the > binding for ox-man, but that's fine for me as I don't use ox-man). > > We can start collecting a list of all Org backends on the Worg wiki. That's > a good idea. OK, let’s see whether additional input arrives. > But doing so in order to not override the binding of some > other backend might not be possible. Fair enough. At least some guidance will be given. >> Or C-r? So far, no back-end uses the >> control key. Any reasons not to do this? >> > > You could probably use C-<letter>, but one has to ensure that it doesn't > override the inbuilt bindings like C-s (C-c C-e C-s ..). Also, not sure if > that override would actually be effective. On my machine using "?\C-r" instead of "?r" as letter works, (resulting in integer number 18 in org-export-registered-backends). However, the Org Export Dispatcher shows "[^R]" as key, which is not ideal. Best wishes Jens
