Carlos Pita <carlosjosep...@gmail.com> writes: > What about leaving everything as it is now and adding C-c C-x C-S-l to mean > "force preview", of course with the C-u and C-u C-u variants. This is a bit > more orthogonal in the sense that the numerical argument controls scope and > the S modifier controls "forcing". Also, it's backwards compatible with > established muscle memory. What do you think? I could write a patch.
`C-c C-x C-S-l` is too ugly, even for me. It is a convention we don't use in Org. This doesn't solve the overlapping between `C-c C-x C-l' and `C-u C-x C-l' either.
