On Mar 30, 2009, at 4:45 PM, Matthew Lundin wrote:
Carsten Dominik <carsten.domi...@gmail.com> writes:
I would not object to renaming the outer div to "container" or
whatever other name we can find a consensus for.
I think I would object to removing it alltogether, I cannot see the
benefit of doing that.
On the other hand, I cannot really see ths issue here, because the
name in the templates could be changed as well, and I would suspect
that this is a common issue name clashes when using templates.
Completely agreed. This is not an important problem. Anyone who
chooses
to use org-mode for publishing a web site should know a little bit
about
hacking css. And as Sebastian R. suggests, we should certainly *not*
change org-export because of some random css template!
Yes.
Still, if it is "common practice" to call this outermost
container "container" instead of "content", I would not
object to rename it.
- Carsten
Let me clarify that I am perfectly happy with the current behavior.
And
I have a vested interest in *not* having it changed, since I'm lazy
and
don't want to have to change my css file again. :)
- Matt
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode