Hi Vladimir,
On Mon, 21 Oct 2019 at 03:21, Vladimir Nikishkin <[email protected]>
wrote:
>
> Can we replace the (set) on line 177 of ob-scheme.el with the following
> form:
> (setq result (if output
> (let ((g-r-o (geiser-eval--retort-output ret)))
> (if g-r-o
> g-r-o
> "Geiser-eval--retort-output returned nil.\nThe
> interpreter produced no output\nor there is a bug in geiser (likely!)"))
> (geiser-eval--retort-result-str ret "")))))
>
> I am not super sure about what's going on there, but I think that output
> can never be an empty list, because in the worst case it is an empty
> string.
> (But I wouldn't vouch for this.)
>
Can you explain more? Have you seen cases
where (geiser-eval--retort-output ret) returns nil, even though you say
just above that it can never do that?
Best wishes,
Neil
