I use it when editing papers mostly. The main difference is I can put
them inline {>~ @jk here is a comment.~<} in a paragraph. I use them to
mark {>.tpyos.<}, text for {>-deletion-<} removal, or {>+insertion+<},
{y>highlighted text <y}, etc. There is some reasonable export code for
these in html and latex. They are like a generalization of an org-link
in a sexp like form, so you can include metadata like an author name, or
other things.
These have a track change kind of functionality (that turns out to be
quite hard to fully replicate) so you can accept or reject each
editmark. Similar to org-links, each editmark can have a variety of
other actions, e.g. a typo has an action to spell check it, and a
file/audio mark can open or play the file.
I also have some diff functions to generate diffs with these markups
from versions of files, including git versions for integration latex
diff, etc.
It does most of what I want well now, but there are still some corners I
don't go into where it doesn't do exactly everything yet, or where I
haven't tested it very fully (e.g. the diffs).
Fraga, Eric <e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk> writes:
> On Monday, 4 Nov 2019 at 15:14, John Kitchin wrote:
>> I have been exploring the use of something I call editmarks for this
>
> Out of curiousity, what do these give you that drawers would not? I use
> :todo: and :note: drawers.
>
> For syntax highlighting, I use hi-lock-mode with, for instance, this
> pattern to highlight todo drawers:
>
> # Hi-lock: (("^:todo:" (0 'hi-yellow prepend)))
>
> thanks,
> eric
--
Professor John Kitchin
Doherty Hall A207F
Department of Chemical Engineering
Carnegie Mellon University
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
412-268-7803
@johnkitchin
http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu
