Samuel Wales <samolog...@gmail.com> writes: > nil has always worked for me. i didn't think a new feature was > necessary, but i am curious. what does your change do?
(See the other message I just sent for a quick explanation.) -- Bastien
Samuel Wales <samolog...@gmail.com> writes: > nil has always worked for me. i didn't think a new feature was > necessary, but i am curious. what does your change do?
(See the other message I just sent for a quick explanation.) -- Bastien