Gustav Wikström <gus...@whil.se> writes: > Ah, you mean the reference on line 3216. No, I don't think it can be > removed. And I honestly don't think it should be either. It's there to > let attachment links mirror the peculiarities of file links. It's > needed for feature compatibility. I don't see the issue with that. > It's a core link type and it needs the information. That particular > logic doesn't affect the parse tree. It's there only to give > attachment links the same properties as file links.
I disagree. This is not a core link type. The issue is that the parser should self-contained. Please use a different way to obtain the information; we already discussed it and suggested multiple solutions.
