Hello, Bastien <b...@gnu.org> writes:
> I'm not sure why the distinction between :open and :follow is needed > in the context of the discussion for exporting attachments: is it > because attachment need to be "open", not just followed? The motivation is that the new behaviour for `:follow' is not compatible with the previous one, since the signature changed. So, we have two options: either we write a workaround, as is done for :export (i.e., `condition-case' with `wrong-number-of-arguments'), or we add new keywords so old code still works during transition. Thinking about it, we can stick to a single solution, e.g., the `condition-case' workaround. Therefore we do not need to introduce a new keyword. However, all "ol-" libraries need to be updated. I'll do that instead. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
