Yes! Thank you Bastien! On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 10:26 AM Bastien <b...@gnu.org> wrote:
> > Also, my question is still open: is there any strong reason to provide, > > out of the box, two template mechanisms in Org? This is genuine > > question. > > No, there is no good reason for two template mechanism, and if we can > rely on org-insert-structure-template only, while still being able to > complete <* at the beginning of the line, that'd be perfect to me. > I definitely agree with this. I voted (slightly late) for having org-tempo in org-modules--not out of any love of org-tempo itself, but more because it feels to me like an extremely natural way to create blocks. The tab key is extremely easy to hit, and having a fully formed block created by typing a short string of characters makes the tab-completion lizard-part of my brain happy in a way that key chord combos simply don't. I think this is partly because I personally can't do key chords at the same rate I can type a string of characters--even if they require technically the same number of keystrokes. Like, I can type a 10 character command *significantly* faster than I can hit a number of different combinations of keys that also happen to be 10 keypresses. I just personally find it really nice! On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 12:37 PM Diego Zamboni <di...@zzamboni.org> wrote: > Thanks Bastien for all your work! > > --Diego > > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 4:50 PM Bastien <b...@gnu.org> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> here are the results of the survey, with *47* voters: >> >> - 26+2 : org-loop-over-headlines-in-active-region => t >> - 25+2 : org-agenda-loop-over-headlines-in-active-region => t >> - 28+3 : org-fontify-done-headline => t >> - 17+4 : org-hide-emphasis-markers => t >> - 10+6 : org-hide-macro-markers => t >> - 15+5 : org-refile-use-cache => t >> - 23+6 : org-special-ctrl-k => t >> - 20+6 : org-allow-promoting-top-level-subtree => t >> - 22+5 : Add org-tempo to org-modules >> >> I've changed the values of these options in master: >> >> - 35+2 : org-src-tab-acts-natively => t >> - 28+3 : org-fontify-done-headline => t >> - 26+2 : org-loop-over-headlines-in-active-region => t >> - 25+2 : org-agenda-loop-over-headlines-in-active-region => t >> >> I've *not* changed the values of these options: >> >> - 23+6 : org-special-ctrl-k => t >> - 22+5 : Add org-tempo to org-modules >> - 20+6 : org-allow-promoting-top-level-subtree => t >> - 17+4 : org-hide-emphasis-markers => t >> - 10+6 : org-hide-macro-markers => t >> - 15+5 : org-refile-use-cache => t >> >> The reason for not changing the default of org-special-ctrl-k is that >> 23 < 47/2. Also, I think it was a mistake to propose this: even the >> org-special- prefix should have warned me. The org-special-* options >> should be nil by default, and while org-special-ctrl-k may be useful, >> it is as useful as org-special-ctrl-a/e, which sticks to nil too. >> >> The reason for not adding org-tempo to org-modules is, on top of the >> poll being 22 < 47/2, that the current discussion on the list leaves >> room for improvements that may lead to move org-tempo from Org's core >> anyway. >> >> The reason for not changing the four other options is that they did >> not get enough votes. >> >> I've push the change for the three options in current master. >> >> Thanks again for participating to the poll and to the discussions! >> >> Best, >> >> -- >> Bastien >> >>
