Hello,

Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:

> Leo Vivier <leo.vivier+...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Yeah, I’ve reached the same conclusion, and I agree that we could
>> mention the normalisation in a docstring.  Do you want me to take care
>> of it?
>
> Sure! Thank you.

The patch is attached.

HTH,

-- 
Leo Vivier
>From e96e96931109026f406b3cabb0186319e902aca7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Leo Vivier <leo.vivier+...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 06:45:32 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] org-element.el: Update comment

* org-element.el (org-element-keyword-parser): Mention that `keyword'
is normalized by being upcased
---
 lisp/org-element.el | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lisp/org-element.el b/lisp/org-element.el
index a5641e6ee..a693cb68d 100644
--- a/lisp/org-element.el
+++ b/lisp/org-element.el
@@ -2174,9 +2174,9 @@ the buffer position at the beginning of the first affiliated
 keyword and CDR is a plist of affiliated keywords along with
 their value.
 
-Return a list whose CAR is `keyword' and CDR is a plist
-containing `:key', `:value', `:begin', `:end', `:post-blank' and
-`:post-affiliated' keywords."
+Return a list whose CAR is a normalized `keyword' (uppercase) and
+CDR is a plist containing `:key', `:value', `:begin', `:end',
+`:post-blank' and `:post-affiliated' keywords."
   (save-excursion
     ;; An orphaned affiliated keyword is considered as a regular
     ;; keyword.  In this case AFFILIATED is nil, so we take care of
-- 
2.26.2

Reply via email to