On Apr 15, 2009, at 11:14 PM, Wes Hardaker wrote:
On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 15:59:14 -0400, Bernt Hansen
<be...@norang.ca> said:
BH> Isn't the filename (org-generic.el) well, um, too generic? If
it's
BH> export-related wouldn't something like org-export-generic.el be
better?
BH> (or maybe even org-export-tools.el? )
Well, I was psuedo-modeling it after the existing file names. Single
dash, etc. I hardly care about the name of the file ;-) Maybe
org-carefree? org-styleless? org-everything?
Well, let's define a naming scheme for attempts to make other exporters.
Since org-export-latex no longer exists, lets indeed use names like
org-export-xxxxxxxxxxx.el
This wil leave the org-xxxxxx.el for other applications.
Thanks.
- Carsten
--
"In the bathtub of history the truth is harder to hold than the soap,
and much more difficult to find." -- Terry Pratchett
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
