Kyle Meyer <k...@kyleam.com> writes: > ,,, > I think this patch is a clear improvement as is, but in the context of > completion (and the stack exchange post you link to), isn't the handling > around *_ALL keywords still a bit off? It seems a caller would want to > complete without the _ALL; to use the example from that post, with > "#+PROPERTY: GENRE_ALL ...", the caller would want to complete "GENRE". > Is it worth providing special handling here? >
With a bit of caffeine in my system, I now see what you wrote and I think you are right: if the _ALL property is present, then the bare property should be added to the completion list if not already there. -- Nick "There are only two hard problems in computer science: cache invalidation, naming things, and off-by-one errors." -Martin Fowler
