Bastien <b...@gnu.org> writes:
> Sure, please go ahead. Will do! :) > Great -- because I know Mario shared a lot of proposals, many of which > where probably ignored or dismissed because the patches did not follow > our conventions closely enough (despite his notable efforts). > > It is of foremost importance that we stick to these conventions: they > help reduce the burden of Org maintainance. But it is a pity that we > lose contributions because contributors cannot follow them and find it > difficult to do so. > > So, be free to both cooperate on making org-plot.el more useful! Thanks. I suspect my work will need reworking to fit, but as long as people are willing to point out what needs changing, I'm willing to take a look at it :D > Also, org-plot.el would do better with a maintainer - would you like > to step in? Simply on the basis that I'm actively interested in the functionality - I'd be happy to sign up for this. As long as you don't mind someone a bit green being assigned (I'm yet to use Emacs for a whole year, but I don't see myself stopping any time soon!). All the best, Timothy.
