So, my point is the following. A shebang is an almost universally
accepted way to specify which interpreter should be used for code
evaluation.
In the ob-core.el, at line 787, the function called
org-babel-expand-src-block makes a buffer out of the noweb-expanded
code.
(I am working with org 20200907)
The sexp is looking like this:
(org-edit-src-code
expanded (concat "*Org-Babel Preview " (buffer-name) "[ " lang " ]*"))
I suggest replacing this sexp with
(org-edit-src-code
(seq-concatenate 'string (or (alist-get :shebang params) "") "\n"
expanded) (concat "*Org-Babel Preview " (buffer-name) "[ " lang "
]*"))
This way the expanded buffer would respect the shebang, and the
resulting buffer would be saveable as a runnable file.
I suspect that the second branch of the (if) should be left as it is,
because non-interactive usage probably means that the code will be
used later as a part of something, and therefore does not need a
shebang.
Vlad
On Sat, 5 Sep 2020 at 15:13, Bastien <b...@gnu.org> wrote:
>
> Vladimir Nikishkin <lockyw...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > I'll try to do one this week, but I can't submit a patch officially
> > because of my employer being staunchly against signing the copyright
> > disclaimer.
>
> :/
>
> So please just give directions on what to modify and how, and that'd
> be enough for someone (probably me) to get started.
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> Bastien
--
Yours sincerely, Vladimir Nikishkin
