ian martins writes: > ob-haxe and ob-java both involve a few changes to ob-core to allow temp > directories instead of just temp files. Should I submit that as a separate > patch?
It looks like that change is included with your ob-java patch [0], which will be considered after 9.4 is released [1], so I think it's fine as is. (In my opinion, splitting up that patch would have been nice, but I don't think it's worth a reroll, at least until some initial comments come in.) [0] https://orgmode.org/list/CAC=rjb7ahmnrq9nc4ao07qk3qzf4lvatmu_r1fwqr+97npn...@mail.gmail.com [1] https://orgmode.org/list/87sgbwgvx6....@gnu.org
