Hi Timothy, TEC <tecos...@gmail.com> writes:
> My mental model was with the website as 'first class' information, > and Worg as a 'secondary' wiki. This does seem like the ideal content to > be collaboratively updated though. this is more like: the main website should contain as little as possible while worg, being collaborative, should contain as much as possible. > I would. Thanks! > The one other reason I lent towards the website initially > though was because I felt that this could be best served by a tiled > layout similar to https://orgmode.tecosaur.com/tools.html - which > currently relies on some CSS not in Worg. That could be added inline, > but that feels slightly hacky to me somehow. We need to enhance worg css to make this possible. > Let me know if there's a particular direction you'd like me to take with > this. I think for handling tiles and other fancy display layouts, it is safer to use a minimal css framework. I like https://bulma.io a lot, but as long as it is CSS-only, it's good. Then once this is done, we can let worg display tiles for some pages. Is this something you would like to explore? > Other than that, I don't believe I have an account on code.orgmode.org > yet --- that could be helpful :P Please send me a private email with your username and I'll create one for you. Thanks! -- Bastien