> What do you think, is it to much work and where can you point out (just > generally) where to look in the source for the code responsible for that?
Sub/superscripts are all dumped inside org.el (together with most of font-lock-related code). arthur miller <arthur.mil...@live.com> writes: > Not long time ago I posted a bug report about superscripts and subscripts not > rendered when in-between italics markings, '/'. I would definitely like to > see that code, and rest for prettie-fying entities factored out into a minor > mode that can be activated in any Emacs buffer. > > What do you think, is it to much work and where can you point out (just > generally) where to look in the source for the code responsible for that? > > > > -------- Originalmeddelande -------- > Från: Bastien <b...@gnu.org> > Datum: 2020-09-23 10:21 (GMT+01:00) > Till: "William Rankin via General discussions about Org-mode." > <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org> > Kopia: William Rankin <will...@bydasein.com>, emacs-de...@gnu.org > Ämne: Re: Re Org 9.4 is out. Can you help? // breaking apart Org Mode > > Hi William, > > thanks a lot for bringing this up. > > Of course, Org would benefit from code cleanup and code refactoring. > > And yes, we can collectively push toward (1) modularizing Org a little > more, (2) making Org features better interact with Emacs core features > and (3) integrating some of Org's features into Emacs core as Emacs > features. > > IMHO the good examples you give fall into one of the category above, > and I think such efforts are likely to happen in that order: 1, 2, 3. > > The better way to make this happen is to start a discussion with a > patch explaining how it makes 1, 2 or 3, then discussing the patch > here on this list - the smaller the better. > > If you cannot make a patch, first discuss your idea, and once the > implementation seems clear, call for help by using a mail header: > > X-Woof-Help: Help with making X a new module > > Thanks, > > -- > Bastien