Matt Huszagh writes: > This patch looks good. I've tested it and it works well for me. Thanks > for coming up with a good solution!
Thanks for testing it out. > I think the one thing still missing is some documentation in the info > manual. Something along the lines of [...] Yep, the manual should definitely be updated in a final patch. What you suggest looks good to me. > Feel free to add this (or something else) to your patch. Or, if you'd > prefer that I created a patch for it, let me know. I'd be happy for you to take what I sent and work it into a proper patch. Here are some other loose ends in addition to the manual update you mentioned: * a NEWS entry for 9.5 * decide whether (:file-desc . []) should be handled explicitly rather than the current "any value that org-babel-read doesn't map to nil or a string" * check that there's a test case for each :file-desc scenario Thanks.