Wow it's been a while. Sorry I dropped this! To reproduce the bug, open the following content in `emacs -q` and run org-archive-subtree on the TEST ITEM:
#+COMMENT: Local Variables: #+COMMENT: mode: org #+COMMENT: org-archive-location: "::datetree/" #+COMMENT: org-odd-levels-only: t #+COMMENT: End: * TEST ITEM You can check that the indentation of the TEST ITEM is more correct if you set org-odd-levels-only to nil. More weirdness also happens if you set org-archive-location to "::datetree/* Archive Header" (while org-odd-levels-only is t). Charles On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 5:44 AM Bastien <b...@gnu.org> wrote: > Hi Charles, > > sorry for the late feedback. > > Charles Tam <m...@charlest.net> writes: > > > I am archiving subtrees of my main Orgmode document to a top-level > > datetree in a secondary file. When I do so, I expect something like > > the following: > > > > * 2020 > > *** 2020-02 February (org-odd-levels-only t) > > ***** 2020-02-27 Thursday > > ******* Archived Item > > > > But instead I get > > > > * 2020 > > *** 2020-02 February > > ***** 2020-02-27 Thursday > > ***** Archived Item > > > > The archived item ends up as a sibling of the targeted date, instead > > of a child. This seems incorrect. > > What command or keybinding do you use when archiving? > > Can you provide a minimal step-by-step recipe to reproduce this bug > with emacs -q ? > > Thanks, > > -- > Bastien >
