Daniele Nicolodi <dani...@grinta.net> writes:
> On 16/11/2020 11:25, Eric S Fraga wrote: >> Daniele, >> >> this looks good. One minor pedantic point: I think you mean >> "interpreted" when you say "interpolated" (several times in the >> text). Otherwise, this is a very useful addition to the manual. > > Thank you for reading and for the comment. > > "interpolated" looks strange to me in this context too, but it is the > word that is currently used in the manual. I decided to stick to this > term for consistency, however, I haven't check if it is used with the > same meaning elsewhere. > > I don't think it is wrong to use "interpolated", but if you thing it > should be changed I can change it and check the manual for consistency. > However, I don't think "interpreted" is the right word either. Probably > "replaced" or "substituted" are better choices in this context. > I agree. Interpolated is consistent with manuals for other programming languages which have similar functionality. However, org is also used by a more diverse community than typical programming languages, so perhaps 'replaced' or 'substituted' would be a better choice? -- Tim Cross
