> Do you find that useful? Who does? I definitely think it's very, very useful! I constantly leave tabs open or use bookmarks, but it'd be great to add them to ORG with a timestamp to watch later. This way I wouldn't forget about them and they wouldn't take memory on the browser if I don't bookmark them.
El lun, 23 nov 2020 a las 12:59, Jean Louis (<bugs@gnu.support>) escribió: > * Ihor Radchenko <yanta...@gmail.com> [2020-11-23 11:14]: > > > Org provides hyperlinks and that useful feature may be used as > > > on-the-fly information visualizer for many groups of smaller pieces of > > > information which could be obtained from some structure or found in > > > real time. > > > > Also, one could quickly select one of multiple links under heading by > > invoking C-c C-o with point at heading. > > I did not know that. That is useful feature for Org. > > Side note: there shall be feature in Org that quickly > captures the full link to the heading. Maybe it already > exists. Instead of constructing links by hand like entering > the file name, entering the heading for the link, there > shall by some automated feature: > > Useful Feature A: > ================= > > - watching 2 windows with 2 Org files > > - position cursor in first Org file to accept the hyperlink > > - move to 2nd Org file any heading > > - press key, and hyperlink is sent to 1st Org file properly > formatted for specific heading in second Org file. > > And then there shall be also collection of hyperlinks: > > Useful feature B to collect hyperlinks similar to above: > ======================================================== > > - user browses one Org file and thinks of collecting various > multiple hyperlinks as such need to be referenced in other > Org file and I refer to headings only for now. > > - user would just invoke the key in any heading and message > would be "Heading `** TODO Things' captured in the ring" > > - user would be able to browse various Org files and collect > hyperlinks in memory collection. > > - After several collections user could then go to other Org > files and invoke key or command to insert the whole > collection of hyperlinks. > > Do you find that useful? Who does? > > That is how I am implementing information in the personal > program HyperScope, it will get published when polished and > ripe. > > Collections are similar to Dired marking, user can mark the > file and later decide what to do with it. > > Org headings can be or could be marked with later action on > the whole collection of headings: > > - re-filing all of them at once > > - sending them all by email to other person (I do with Org) > > - sending hyperlinks in other Org file (I do in HyperScope) > > - creating new Org file with the collection of headings > > - assigning properties to collection of headings, tasks, > todo or similar. I am often assigning tasks to people, > collection would help me re-assign tasks instead of doing it > one by one. > > > In the following example, C-c C-o would raise a buffer listing all > > the links. Then, the links can be selected by pressing 1/2/3 (to > > open first/second/third link): > > That is new to me and fine feature, thank you for reference. > > But this here, this chunk of various properties shows how > Org users wish Org to be way more structured, that Org wants > to become more than just plain text, it wants to become > database. > > *** NEXT <!point!> Commit all the changes > SCHEDULED: <2020-11-24 Tue .+1d> > :PROPERTIES: > :CREATED: [2019-04-18 Thu 09:40] > :STYLE: habit > :REPEAT_TO_STATE: NEXT > :LOGGING: DONE(!) > :ARCHIVE: %S_archive_%y.org::* Habits > :ORG-TIME-BONUS: 0 > :LAST_REPEAT: [2020-11-23 Mon 14:10] > :SHOWFROMDATE: 2020-11-09 > :RESET_CHECK_BOXES: t > :END: > >
