On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 9:42 AM Neil Jerram <neiljer...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Wonderful, thank you. I have been thinking it would be nice to have a test > suite along these lines, but detailed doc like this is more feasible and > maintainable. A test suite is a good idea as a next step to protect correct behaviors. I want to first look at actual behaviors and get agreement on correct behaviors first. On the other hand, each of the language's test suites should cover the same ground so a separate test suite may not make sense. > When time permits I will work on adding Scheme to this page. Great, thanks! > FWIW, I did not understand the "functional" and "scripting" terms that you > use on this page. > > I've understood now, from > https://orgmode.org/worg/org-contrib/babel/intro.html, that you mean > "results: value" and "results: output". For me it would be better if you > said that instead of "functional" and "scripting", as the former is what I > can actually type in my Org files. yes, it's in the manual as well [1], but I agree that alternating between two sets of terms here is unnecessarily confusing. Will change. [1] https://orgmode.org/manual/Results-of-Evaluation.html#Results-of-Evaluation