Kyle Meyer <k...@kyleam.com> writes:

> It might be worth stepping back and describing what your use case for
> this change is, and considering other ways to address it (not
> necessarily as a change to Org itself).

Since the problem needs to be revisited, I've closed this patch.

Nicholas, feel free to tackle the initial issue differently and
to provide another patch in another dedicated thread.  Thanks!

-- 
 Bastien

Reply via email to