Hi, Qqwy/Wiebe-Marten <q...@gmx.com> writes:
> However, the LaTeX that is exported will still create normal `enumerize` > lists that do /not/ show up as alphabetical but rather still use `1.`, > `2.`, `3.` for numbering. > > I think this current behaviour is at the very least surprising, and > possibly unintended. I use the enumitem package (http://mirrors.ctan.org/macros/latex/contrib/enumitem/enumitem.pdf) for lists in LaTeX. For an alphabetical list, for example: #+begin_src org ,#+LaTeX_Header: \usepackage{enumitem} ,#+ATTR_LaTeX: :options [label=\alph*.,widest=a] a. Lorem b. ipsum c. dolor #+end_src And to export to LaTeX and HTML, you can define a macro like this: #+begin_src org ,#+MACRO: alphalist (eval (if (org-export-derived-backend-p org-export-current-backend 'latex) "#+ATTR_LaTeX: :options [label=\\alph*.,widest=a]" "#+ATTR_HTML: :type a")) {{{alphalist}}} a. Lorem b. ipsum c. dolor' #+end_src Best regards, Juan Manuel
