Kyle, > Hmm, given that the lexical-binding change to ob-core was back in Org > 9.0 (November 2016), it seems like dynamic scoping wasn't really being > relied on (or, if it was, downstream code has already been adjusted). > In my view it'd be better to stick with lexical scoping for these > variables, with callers explicitly passing the subset of needed > variables to the underlying function(s).
yes, that makes sense. thanks. cheers, Greg
