Hi Maxim, Thanks again. In my case, I keep getting the wrong result. In addition to the test I did in a virtual machine with Fedora, I use Arch Linux in my every day computers, with locales correctly (I hope) configured as es_ES.UTF-8 (there was a typo in my previous mail, sorry: 'en_ES.UTF-8'). In my /etc/locale.conf file I have:
LANG=es_ES.UTF-8 LC_ADDRESS=es_ES.UTF-8 LC_IDENTIFICATION=es_ES.UTF-8 LC_MEASUREMENT=es_ES.UTF-8 LC_MONETARY=es_ES.UTF-8 LC_NAME=es_ES.UTF-8 LC_NUMERIC=es_ES.UTF-8 LC_PAPER=es_ES.UTF-8 LC_TELEPHONE=es_ES.UTF-8 LC_TIME=es_ES.UTF-8 And with locale -a, I get a list of enabled locales: C en_US.utf8 es_ES.utf8 POSIX However, I keep getting the wrong result :-( (Arch, Emacs 27.2). Even with LANG=en_EN.UTF-8 \ emacs -nw -Q -L ~/src/org-mode/lisp/ -L ~/src/org-mode/contrib/lisp/ \ list.org Maybe the problem is on Arch's side (?), although it was also reproducible in the test I did with Fedora in virtual machine and Emacs 27. Best regards, Juan Manuel Maxim Nikulin writes: > On 14/04/2021 02:08, Juan Manuel Macías wrote: >> The situation is that with locales configured for Spanish from Spain >> (en_ES.UTF-8) the list is not ordered correctly, unless those three >> spaces from org-sort-remove-invisible are removed. But I couldn't say >> why or if that would be appropriate as a patch... > > Did not you get a warning like the following one? > > (process:220): Gtk-WARNING **: 15:17:45.066: Locale not supported by C > library. > Using the fallback 'C' locale. > >> Regarding the collation rule of forms with emphasis, at least in Spanish >> these should come after the non-emphasized forms. I don't know if this >> is a general rule also for other languages (at least it seems more >> natural that the forms without emphasis are placed before). > > LANG=es_ES.UTF-8 \ > emacs -Q -L ~/src/org-mode/lisp/ -L ~/src/org-mode/contrib/lisp/ \ > list.org > > - a > - /a/ > - v > - /v/ > > So it works accordingly to your expectation. Emacs 25.2.2, > Ubuntu-18.04 container. > > I have generated es_ES.UTF-8 locale using > > dpkg-reconfigure locales > > Depending on linux distribution you run, the locale may be ready to > use or not. I tend to think that in minimal environment of virtual > machine it was missed. > > I had an idea to add a test for sorting of items including emphasized > ones but test-org-list/sort forces C locale. Maybe it was done to > avoid failures due to missed locale. > >