Am 27.04.2021 um 16:07 schrieb Bruce D'Arcus:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 9:58 AM Denis Maier <denisma...@mailbox.org> wrote:
Your example fails on 1 because it suggests the citation attaches to
(starts) the following sentence.
Only if you mentally parse it as a parenthetical author-date citation.
I don't think so. A period is a way we delimit sentences; is it not?
Sure, but what about this:
This is a sentence with a footnote attached to it.[fn:: This footnote
belongs to the preceding sentence, doesn't it?]
...
I'm after all not totally sure we need a one-size-fits-all solution.
This particular sub-thread started when Andras noted he needed a way
to handle this case, and Nicolas coded up an initial example.
So I think we just need to establish what a reasonable default is.
Absolutely, I'm just asking what can be changed afterwards, maybe by
providing an extended inline quotes syntax or so.
Denis
