Aloha Timothy,
Thanks for your kind response.
Sorry for the clumsy patch, which I guess would also benefit from
an addition to the manual, as well?
Larger question: do we really want to tinker with ob-latex in this
way? Or, should changes like this patch follow a path indicated
by Tim Cross and into their own package, say ob-latex-ex, which
might someday replace ob-latex if it proved useful and stable?
All the best,
Tom
Timothy <tecos...@gmail.com> writes:
Hi Thomas,
On the surface, this looks reasonable to me :)
Just commenting on some technicalities with the patch itself:
- In ORG-NEWS it would be good to wrap the content over multiple
lines
instead of having a single 270 char line :)
- You seem to have an anomalous change to the ob-python :return
entry
- I don't think your patch subject follows the convention for
Org, it
should be:
"main file/feature: overall change summary"
so, something like
"ox-latex: allow for arbitrary float environments"
rather than
"LaTeX export: arbitrary float environments"
Thanks for the patch :)
Timothy
--
Thomas S. Dye
https://tsdye.online/tsdye
