Hi Greg, I just checked and it induces a syntax error, which I did not know, but turns out to be quite useful because it means that an untangled or incorrectly tangled file will fail to run beyond that point. Best! Tom
On Sun, May 2, 2021 at 9:11 PM Greg Minshall <minsh...@umich.edu> wrote: > > Tom, that is quite devious, actually. thank you very much! do you > know, by the way, what flycheck and/or the shell make the "<<&" > construct out to be? cheers, Greg >