Le 03 May 2021, Bastien <b...@gnu.org> a écrit : > I suggest a criterium for keeping ob*.el files in Org could be that > the extension is known by Emacs _or_ that the supported language is > well-established.
I happen to be an active user of ob-lilypond. Lilypond is certainly peripheral to the world of programming languages. It is well established and active as an equivalent of LaTeX for music though ([1][2][3]). It comes with built-in support for Emacs [4]. I see no reason to not move ob-lilypond to org-contrib. I understand that only few of us use it these days. I can’t stand up as a maintainer since my Lisp skills and my knowledge of org-mode are quite insufficient for that. I was happy to see that someone submitted a patch for ob-lilypond in January. I hope that by the time something breaks I’ll be able to submit a patch myself. Regards, Victor [1] http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/ [2] https://music.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/lilypond [3] https://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/lilypond [4] http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.21/Documentation/usage/text-editor-support.html#emacs-mode