Ihor Radchenko <yanta...@gmail.com> writes: > Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes: > >> Currently, what Org does in this situation is unimportant, because the >> behaviour is simply undefined, which is, IMO, tolerable. If we decide to >> define it, it needs to be documented. > > I agree that currently there is no urgent need to decide on this, but > there (hopefully) will be in the future. > > I am trying to implement storage of heading elements in > org-element-cache and reusing them later in org.el functions when > getting tags, properties, schedules, etc. This, among other things, > requires consistency between org.el and org-element.el when parsing > headlines.
Could an extensible pre-hook that runs a list of functions take care of the inconsistencies where each function recognizes one change to the standard grammar and adjusts the input accordingly? -- David Masterson
