On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 11:15 AM Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> wrote: > > Hello, > > "Bruce D'Arcus" <bdar...@gmail.com> writes: > > >> Bibliography is printed using "\printbibliography" command. Additional > >> options may be passed to it through a property list attached to the > >> "print_bibliography" keyword. E.g., > >> > >> #+print_bibliography: :section 2 :heading subbibliography > > > I don't believe citeproc-el currently supports any of these features, > > and it looks like the citeproc-el API doesn't even have an optional > > parameter to put details like these. > > > > As a consequence, if one adds an example like the above, so that one > > has two print_bibliography lines, one will get two, duplicate > > bibliography lists outside of oc-biblatex. > > I don't understand how you reach that consequence… If the citation > processor does not understand the properties, it simply ignores them, > but obeys to "print_bibliography" directive anyhow. > > Have you tried it? I'm not sure to understand your concern.
Yes. I think we're saying the same thing, but maybe I need to clarify the implications better? See below. Let me illustrate with a full example, where the @einstein entry has a "keyword" field of "primary." The use case is a user wanting a bibliography with two sections, which is a common case for this feature. Note that I am unsure of the exact invocation to achieve this with biblatex (as in, it's probably wrong), but I don't think that matters to illustrate the point. >>>>> #+language: en #+bibliography: test.bib #+cite_export: csl 1. simple: [cite:@latexcompanion] 2. primary source: [cite:@einstein] 3. affixes: [cite/text:see @latexcompanion chapter 2 p.23] 4. quote, punctuation: “my quote” [cite/text/caps:@latexcompanion]. * Bibliography ** Primary Sources #+print_bibliography: :keyword primary :title "Primary Sources" ** Secondary Sources #+print_bibliography: :title "Secondary Source" <<<<< Here's the output from oc-csl: >>>>> 1. simple: (Goossens, Mittelbach, and Samarin 1993) 2. primary source: (Einstein 1905) 3. affixes: (see Goossens, Mittelbach, and Samarin 1993, chaps. 2 p.23) 4. quote, punctuation: “my quote” (Goossens, Mittelbach, and Samarin 1993). 1 Bibliography ══════════════ 1.1 Primary Sources ─────────────────── Einstein, Albert. 1905. “Zur Elektrodynamik Bewegter Körper. (German) [on the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies].” /Annalen Der Physik/ 322 (10):891–921. Goossens, Michel, Frank Mittelbach, and Alexander Samarin. 1993. /The LaTeX Companion/. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley. 1.2 Secondary Sources ───────────────────── Einstein, Albert. 1905. “Zur Elektrodynamik Bewegter Körper. (German) [on the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies].” /Annalen Der Physik/ 322 (10):891–921. Goossens, Michel, Frank Mittelbach, and Alexander Samarin. 1993. /The LaTeX Companion/. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley. <<<<< So two duplicate lists. Does that clarify? The other common case I am familiar with is a bibliography per section of a document. It may not be practical to do anything other than current behavior, but I was hoping some biblatex experts might have some thoughts. And, of course, wanting to flag this for András to think about, since ideally citeproc-el would support this. Bruce
