On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 12:34 PM Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> wrote: > > "Bruce D'Arcus" <bdar...@gmail.com> writes: > > > Right now, citeproc-el, and hence also oc-csl, only supports the "bare" > > variant. > > > > Would it be feasible, and make sense, to fall back all "bare" variants > > to "bare" for now? > > > > So this: > > > > [cite//bare-caps:@latexcompanion] > > > > ... would render as: > > > > Doe 2019 > > We dropped variant inheritance some time ago already, when the suggested > syntax was style/variant/subvariant... Now, "bare" and "bare-caps" are > totally different from Org Cite POV. I'd rather not re-introduce this.
Oh wait, I just realized citeproc-el already has a parameter for "caps" (which I hadn't realized). - "bare" -> "suppress-affixes" parameter - "caps" -> "capitalize-first" Right? So that would allows support for: - "bare" - "caps" - "bare-caps" So if he adds an equivalent of the "full" parameter, that could extend the sub-styles support in oc-csl? > Maybe "bare" need to be promoted as a full-fledged style, so "bare/caps" > could fallback to "bare". I don't know. I thought of that too, but it won't work, because "bare" applies to multiple styles. Bruce
