On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 1:03 PM Timothy <tecos...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Bruce D'Arcus <bdar...@gmail.com> writes: > > > Thanks Timothy. > > > > What's your view on modifying current default? > > I think latexmk is a pretty reasonable expectation, and your > justification that it's more important seems sound to me. > > Using the value seen in my config, I've found that at the least my > version of latexmk interprets the arguments such that > `org-latex-compilers' still works as expected (with xelatex, lualatex, > etc.). Perhaps this would make sense as a new default if it works well > for others too (without the -shell-escape bit though).
Here's the current command for the "latexmk" option: "latexmk -g -pdf -pdflatex=\"%latex\" -outdir=%o %f" ... and here's what you have, minus shell-escape. "latexmk -f -pdf -%latex -interaction=nonstopmode -output-directory=%o %f" Do they not both account for the engine (luatex, xetex, etc.)? In any case, whatever the command is, clearly it should. Bruce
