Hello, Michael Dauer <mick.da...@gmail.com> writes:
> I would understand that the export would take the export settings of the > current heading to control the export of the complete subtree. That's correct. > 1. The much better logic would be that each node determines e.g. the > with-planning by its own (or inherited) properties. This is not how it is implemented. Export options are per export process, not per node. Besides, the above would not make sense for one-off items, like title:nil. I guess the much better logic would first need to distinguish global from local export options. But I don't think this is worth the trouble. > 2. This actually works when the scheduled date is (incorrectly) placed > below the drawer. It is not just treated as the first paragraph, but > omitted when the with-planning property of its node is nil, while normal > text would be exported. Would you mind providing an ECM for it? I'm not sure what example you're referring to. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
