HI Jacopo,
I've just taken a look at your patch and it looks good :) glad to see you've also followed the commit message format. I hope this gets merged soon. -- Timothy p.s. Just a little note for the future: it's good if you have full sentences in the description of the changes. Jacopo De Simoi <jacop...@protonmail.com> writes: > Dear All, > > Please find attached a patch (against master) which takes care of the > following issue. Assume I have a block like this > > #+begin_src sh :tangle no > This should not be tangled > #+end_src > > Then the block is correctly ignored when tangling the whole file, but > erroneously tangled (to a file named "no") when tangling is run with the > universal argument (so that only the current block should be tangled) > > This happens because the check for the "no" option is not performed when > tangling a single block. In the proposed patch I address this issue by > checking for the "no" option in the function org-babel-effective-tangled- > filename
