As Emmenuel pointed out, we missed that Nicolas already thought of this, and you can do this:
#+org-cite-global-bibliography: nil With that, there's no problem, and lots of flexibility. On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 8:53 PM Thomas S. Dye <tsd@tsdye.online> wrote: > > I used to have a global bibliography that my employees all used. > Every project also had a local bibliography for citations that > didn't appear in the global bibliography. At the end of a > project, after the editor had cleaned up the local bibliography, > I'd merge it with the global bibliography using a utility called > bibtool. > > hth, > Tom > > Vikas Rawal <vikasra...@gmail.com> writes: > > >> It seems like that should not be the case, i.e. if you define > >> BIBLIOGRAPHY > >> keywords it means you do not want to use the ones > >> in org-cite-global-bibliography. Is there a scenario where the > >> union of those > >> makes sense? > > > > I second this. The local bibliographies should supercede the > > global. > > > > Vikas > > > -- > Thomas S. Dye > https://tsdye.online/tsdye >