Hi Matt, Matt Huszagh <huszaghm...@gmail.com> writes:
> I've tested it, and if you revert > 78783f4e47901255695031dae0efcbb301a40878 and apply the new patch, it > will apply with conflicts. Let me know if you run into any difficulties, > have any concerns, etc. Done, thanks a lot. > Here's the patch for the news item. Bear in mind that the last part > about lazy evaluation is only true for the newest patch. Applied too, thanks! -- Bastien
