Hello, "Bruce D'Arcus" <bdar...@gmail.com> writes:
>> The current list of styles and variants included in the oc export >> processors was a first step, with a goal to provide a solid starting >> point, and citations that are more-or-less portable across the >> backends. >> >> But that raises an obvious question: what next? Are we at next already? >> I'd like, for example, to suggest adding "noauthor/bare" -> "cite*" to >> oc-biblatex. Done. >> I also think we should add a way for users to use a direct command for >> natbib and biblatex. [...] >> Perhaps some prefix for a style that signals to pass on directly for a >> specific export processor; like [cite/blx+footcite ...]. I'm not too keen on extending the citation syntax. >> In that case, the oc-biblatex processor would pass that command on as >> is, but other processors would ignore it, and use the default >> instead. This is the point of styles. We could allow custom ones. >> And if we were to add this, we'd still need to answer my first >> question: when and how to add specific style/variant mappings to the >> oc processors. It is possible to send a patch if it is something useful. Some processors (probably only biblatex at this point, we probably cover everything in natbib) may also introduce a customizable variable for user-defined styles. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
