On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 11:58 AM Eric S Fraga <e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> Hi Bruce,
>
> thank you for the quick response.
>
> On Thursday, 21 Oct 2021 at 11:27, Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
> > Maybe I'm missing something, but why is that necessary?
>
> It's highly likely that I am missing something (not a rare occurence
> ;-)) but, out of the box without explicitly specifying a follow
> function, the default behaviour is not well-defined? At least, C-c C-o
> doesn't work as I would expect. It seems a reasonable expectation to
> have a default that works out of the box?
Yes.
But the default org-cite-follow-processor is "basic", so it should now
work "out of the box". If for some reason it isn't, maybe there's an
issue there?
Just to be clear what I was meaning by the modularity, you could do
this if you wanted:
(setq org-cite-insert-processor 'oc-bibtex-actions
org-cite-follow-processor 'basic
org-cite-activate-processor 'org-ref-cite
org-cite-export-processors '((latex bibtex)))
Bruce
