Dear All, On Sat, 1 Jan 2022 at 14:53, Julien Chastang <julien.c.chast...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have been experimenting with org-cite. I noticed that I can insert > (org-cite-insert) all bibtex types *except* for @conference. [...] > yet I believe @conference is a valid bibtex type. I noticed that > org-bibtex-types has an empty description for the conference type, but I > don't know if that has anything to do with it. I hope I have not missed > anything obvious. it seems that 'conference' is indeed a valid BibTeX entry type, but is only an alias of 'inproceedings' and was included for some (nowadays obscure?) compatibility reasons, while biblatex doesn't support it at all. Consequently, you can simply use 'inproceedings' instead. If this is not an option, then you can force org-cite to parse a bibliography as a (strict) BibTeX bibliography instead of the default biblatex parsing by using the 'bibtex' extension in the file's name, this should cause 'conference' entries to be treated as valid. best wishes, András
