Jan 14, 2022, 07:42 by maciasch...@posteo.net:
> fatiparty--- via "General discussions about Org-mode." writes: > >> _a geographical region that corresponds to present-day Israel and Palestine_ >> > > In any case, from a strictly (ortho)typographical point of view this is a > matter of nesting emphasis. If what you want to do is highlight a word > within another emphasis (an underline), the correct typographical > procedure is to italicize or bold that word: > > _a /geographical/ region that corresponds to present-day Israel and > Palestine_ > > ==> > > \uline{a \emph{geographical} region that corresponds to present-day > Israel and Palestine} > > What you can't do in Org is nest emphases of the same order: > > #+begin_example > /The translators of the /Odyssey/ in the Hispanic tradiction/ > #+end_example > > It does not produce in LaTeX: > > #+begin_src latex > \emph{The translators of the \emph{Odyssey} in the Hispanic tradiction} > #+end_src > > It is not a matter of a passage being de-emphasized (it doesn't work > that way), but rather that it is emphasized within another emphasis > text. In the above case, the way to emphasize Odyssey in a text already > emphasized in italics is with a normal font or with an underline (the > correct thing is with a normal font). > I am discussing something slightly different. Here is normal text within -which there is some understated text- before continuing with normal text. > There are two separate questions here: how that is represented in Org > and how it should be exported. > When using export, things should happens as happens with emphasized text (but with good visual indication that text is understated compared to normal text).