Hi Maxim,

Max Nikulin writes:

> So formally this feature of pandoc is a bug (due to different kind of
> parser). It is the reason why a corpus of tests should exist in a
> format that can be easily imported from various programming languages.

Your conclusions seem logical to me. It may sound a bit surrealistic to
think that Pandoc is doing it wrong precisely for doing it "right", but...
if from Org's point of view this is not something specified in its
syntax, then here Pandoc makes a mistake parsing Org's syntax. All this
is very curious, indeed. I confess that before I did not see the need for
those corpus of tests very clearly, but this case has opened my mind.

Best regards,

Juan Manuel 

Reply via email to