No Wayman <iarchivedmywholel...@gmail.com> writes: >> I think Nicolas gave some reasonable comments, didn't he? He >> suggested >> to incorporate some of the ideas into the existing Org mode >> code. >> >> https://orgmode.org/list/87wo66t8i7....@gmail.com > > I believe you're referring to: > > https://list.orgmode.org/87y2qlgq33....@nicolasgoaziou.fr/ > > He had some reasonable questions about the design, but said he > only uses very basic capture templates, and could not comment > beyond that on the design. The hope was that people who use more > of org-capture's features would chime in. That didn't happen.
I just pinged that thread again. Note that I strongly support adding doct to Org. > Of course doct's features could be added to org-capture in a > piecemeal fashion, but I'm not too keen on contributing anything > non-trivial to Org these days. Too much back and forth coupled > with discussion that can stall due to lack of interest. > e.g. > https://list.orgmode.org/87h7e6dluc....@gmail.com/ > https://list.orgmode.org/87tuit73ij....@gmail.com/ I cannot comment on the lexical binding thing. I do not really know lexical binding internals enough to judge what kind of problem that patch is trying to solve. However, Bastien commented on the second patch. I do find it useful as well. I think the only problem with that patch is that it is not listed in updates.orgmode.org and Bastien missed your last reply. Best, Ihor
