Ihor Radchenko <yanta...@gmail.com> writes:
Vikas Rawal <vikasra...@gmail.com> writes:
What is the general view of the community about this? Is there
a
comprehensive discussion of pros and cons of each?
Prof. Kitchin himself provided a summary on why he decided to
give up on
using org-cite. See
https://github.com/jkitchin/org-ref/issues/892
This claim in Kitchin's summary surprised me:
"It comes down to org-ref using bibtex/biblatex as the predominant
citation processor, and org-cite using CSL. These two processors
have different syntaxes, and I don't think it is possible to have
a single approach that works for both of them without making
compromises in capability."
I wonder what are the "compromises in capability" required to
support both?
I haven't found them yet, though I'm just now finishing old
projects started prior to the release of org-cite and haven't
worked through a LaTeX export project with it. My first, and so
far only, project with org-cite was for a simple html-based
presentation using CSL, and I was pleased with the results and
relative ease of setup.
All the best,
Tom
--
Thomas S. Dye
https://tsdye.online/tsdye
