On 21/03/2022 18:51, John Kitchin wrote:
citenum and bibentry are the only two I am not sure have a CSL analog.
I read your messages once more and I should say that I feel some
disagreement of this one (I removed most of it) and the earlier and
longer one from Sun, 20 Mar 2022 20:31:29 -0400
https://list.orgmode.org/m2sfrc149c....@andrew.cmu.edu
I admit that org-ref is carefully tuned to your workflow. I hope, it is
possible to left aside decomposition of org-cite into modules for some time.
Let's assume org-cite with natbib backend for citations and org-ref for
cross-references. It seems, a couple of missed styles currently is not a
problem due to the defcustom for the mapping.
Are there still any technical limitations that prevent getting in the
exported LaTeX file the same citation commands as for org-ref?
In particular I am worrying concerning
https://github.com/jkitchin/org-ref README (and the same phrase from the
earlier message):
org-cite does not meet my citation and technical document publishing
needs, and it was not possible to integrate it into org-ref without
compromising those.
Does it refer to exported result or to convenience of working with
citations? Would it help if it were possible to choose style by its
natbib command?
I see that you do not like org-cite styles, but I can not figure out
what are the real blockers that prevent producing documents having the
same quality.