>>>>> Russell Adams <rlad...@adamsinfoserv.com> writes:
> On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 09:23:27PM +0300, Daniel Fleischer wrote:
>> Russell Adams [2022-05-11 Wed 18:14] wrote:
>>
>> > Could I add some minor mode to say text-mode with
>> auto-fill-mode and > aspell somewhere when opening those blocks?
>>
>> Hi! If you're editing text why do you need a special buffer? You
>> can edit them in the orgmode buffer and enjoy all its textual
>> features.
> First up, it's because it used to work and now it doesn't. ;]
> Second it can be very useful to work on a sub-buffer, or indirect
> buffer for some content. Why shouldn't I be able to edit the
> contents of that block inside an indirect buffer where my
> beginning-of-buffer, end-of-buffer, word wrap, or global find and
> replace are constrained to that block of text?
> This works for example blocks, but no longer for verse and quote
> blocks. These are native Org block types and not my fanciful made
> up ones. Why should the popup work for example blocks, but not the
> others? That borders on a bug, where my question was considered as
> a configuration question.
I very much support the idea that special and source blocks should be
treatable in the same way. I'd like to be able to edit example and quote
using C-c '.
Best wishes,
Colin Baxter.
